10 questions for San Rafael
Editor’s note: On June 24th, 550 people attended a meeting of a new
group, San Rafael 2000, to discuss .San Rafael’s General Plan. This is an
edited version Of. a speech delivered by Dwayne Hunn, which he asked San Rafael
2000 consultants and the City of San Rafael “to provide some community insight
and answers to 10 questions. “Here are the questions:
By Dwayne Hunn
§
Two
of East San Rafael’s concerns are traffic and affordable housing. If the Kerner
street property owners have paid their traffic mitigation fees and some of their money has undergrounded
utilities, put in a pond, a bike
path, and Shoreline Park, why hasn’t Kerner been connected to help alleviate
congestion at intersections like Bellam and throughout East San Rafael?
§
The
proposed Irene Street Overcrossing is
estimated to cost over $22 million. The Grange Plan Overcrossing is estimated at $4. million. Shouldn’t the
Grange Plan be analyzed in detail to see if it can more quickly and efficiently
address East San Rafael traffic needs?
§
Does
the overpass proposed from Merrydale to the Civic Center Drive with no offramps
onto 101 really serve to alleviate traffic snarls, or does it merely make
shopping at the Emporium easier for those at the Civic Center?
§
Does
reducing the floor area ratios of future projects really reduce traffic
generation? If you reduce the building footprint
that can stand on a piece of
land to half of what some nice buildings now have-- will future buildings. be
built? In certain years Phoenix Leasing
has generated more in sales tax revenues to the City of San Rafael than has
Macys. Will buildings like Phoenix Leasing that generate minimal traffic, huge
traffic mitigation fees, and gigantic sales tax revenues to the City be built
in the future on expensive San Rafael land when only 1/2 of the floor area
ratio is allowed?
§
How
can adequate child care facilities be tied into the East San Rafael
neighborhood through the General Plan? Child care overflows into land use,
traffic and circulation, and low cost housing needs — so picking a spot to plug
that into the General Plan is imperative.
§
By
being more successful than anticipated, Federal Express has been forced to
close its counter at 3 p.m. Because its service is generating too much peak
hour traffic. If Federal Express is generating 100 excessive peak hour vehicle
trips per day-- rather than closing them down couldn’t they have been required
to assist SMART-- the local jitney program--to generate 100 more peak hour
riders per day? Shouldn’t the General Plan have measures that encourage
businesses to find or assist with traffic solutions rather than merely hurting
businesses?
§
How
can a General Plan allow for senior developments only on flat land while
seemingly allowing for all other housing needs to be answered on only flat
land? Will not starting families and others with flat land housing wants have
inherent conflicts with such excessively specific policy findings? Elderly
housing projects almost inherently have transit systems built into them. Doesn’t
this policy make providing affordable senior housing much more difficult in
California’s to-be oldest median age county?
§
As the hub of the county, San Rafael must find a way
to produce housing affordable for it workers. Where are the implementation tools
to provide housing to those households earning $16,000 to $30,000 dollars, the
household incomes of the bulk of San Rafael workers whose Sonoma commute adds
to regional gridlock? Where are the implementing tools that will allow San
Rafael workers to own homes at costs between $50,000 and $75,000? These prices can be reached, as households whose average income was $17,000 paid an
average of $51,000 for NEH’s Skylark Meadows condo/ townhouses.
§
The
problem lies in how we have become accustomed to moving around in a suburban
arena while mass transit solutions were designed for the urban arena.
Nonetheless, we have the transit modes to handle our problems. The range from
buses, light rail vehicles, jitneys, motorized cable cars, to car pools. What
we need are transit systems that are managed better for our suburban arena and
our moving patterns. How will the General Plan encourage and
stimulate better transit management solutions? How will the General Plan
encourage entrepreneurs and private developers to answer the community’s need
for more effective transit when funds for government to do so have vanished?
Thanks for your
patience, like Moses you are probably grateful
there were only ten.
Dwayne Hunn is a board member of. North Bay Transportation Management Association and Canal Community Alliance