Published Marin IJ Wednesday May 15, 1996

Traffic in Marin:

 

Where do we go now?

 

Opinion

Marin independent Journal

 

All aboard!  The future won’t wait

Dwayne Hunn

 

In the late  1970’s  Peter Calthorpe was an associate of  to-be State Architect  Sim Van der Ryn, working to establish a Solar Village at Hamilton Air Force Base.   By  the 1980’s,  Peter was on his own  preaching for developing Pedestrian Pocket communities where people could walk to and from parks, schools, work places and transit options other than the car nestled in suburbia’s  omnipresent garage.

Pedestrian Pockets offered the opportunity to develop the community that ethnic neighborhoods of the 40’s and 50’s and his Sausalito houseboat neighbors  had.  Unfortunately, Marin’s assumed environmentalists, and  the power structure they supported, wouldn’t listen to concepts that allowed clustered communities of affordable housing to be built  on the 13+ large parcels that then laid adjacent to Marin and Sonoma’s Northwest Pacific Right of  Way.

For years, few  seemed  to pay attention  to  Calthorpe’s rejuvenated concept or pay for  his services.  Luckily, his Berkeley students helped keep him going until the rest of  the country  realized  the good sense of  Pedestrian Pockets and paid him to do them.   In  a shrinking world where our lifestyle consumes more than its proportional share, and our lack of community produces an abundance of dysfunctional  acts,  Pedestrian Pockets design part of  the needed  solutions.

In 1991 Peter was the keynote speaker for the region’s  first  Land Use and Transportation  Conference sponsored by North Bay Transportation & Management Association(TMA), the first such TMA funded in Northern California.  Twenty regional leaders participated in the all day conference to which 400 came to listen and participate with the panels. 

This May 19th a similar conference will be held with Phil Erickson of Calthorpe & Associates serving as a keynote speaker.  Phil will report on  a study that Peter has tried to have funded for 20 years -- a  Sonoma/Marin Transportation and Land Use Study.    Twenty years ago the 13+ large parcels were  less fettered with planned  or existing expensive suburban sprawl  homes entwined amidst a morass of  costly curbs and gutters and dead end streets.

But it is better late than never for Marin and  Sonoma counties  to  use their remaining land to support uses that enhance the environment  through more sustainable developments that allow  for  beneficial  reuse of  the rail line with passenger and freight traffic. 

Thanks to narrow minded planning, Marin rates at the bottom of the Bay Region’s 9 county list when its Labor Market Independence is ranked.  In Marin 70% of county workers live here versus Sonoma’s comparable 94% .  In Marin 59% of employed county residents work here versus Sonoma’s comparable 82%.   In Marin’s construction transportation, communications and public utilities industries in-commutes hover near 50% versus Sonoma’s 10%.

Let’s hope Marin will waste no more time in providing land uses that will help make the rail line more economically viable in the future. Even before Pedestrian Pockets are built,  the existing rail line can  help reduce environmental impacts.  Consider:

·        As development moves forward on  Bel Marin Keys, Hamilton and St. Vincent/Silveira, wouldn’t it be more environmentally beneficial to import needed  fill and building materials by train rather than by road  hammering, pollution belching  trucks?

 

And when you consider how much more fuel efficient trains are than cars, and how they, too, add to community building:

·        Wouldn’t Marin’s true environmentalists want to start setting the environmental and community standards for other parts of  the country who have the opportunity we have?

 

 

 

Dwayne Hunn was Executive Director of the North Bay TMA and now works on land use, transportation and political issues as well as with Excel Telecommunications.

 

(Unedited version.)