Marin IJ April 11, 1999
…but, from where I sit, they’re part of the problem
by Dwayne Hunn
In February the IJ reported that Senator Boxer introduced
legislation that would guarantee $2 billion of oil companies taxes be siphoned
off to maintain public parks, expand urban parks and protect the country’s
wildlife. It would be titled “Permanent Protection for America’s Resources
2000.” Ann Thomas of Marin Baylands
immediately saw the most pressing need for this money, “We would love to
acquire Canalways. It would be an
absolute jewel for San Rafael to preserve that site.”
..
Because the nation’s
people face more pressing needs and
spending $2 billion differently could
better help the environment, why not have a better title and spending
program? Although comfortable Marin
does not typify national needs, even here it is easy to spend on more humane
and environmental needs..
In the last 20+ years
Marin has:
·
spent $32.3
million acquiring 13,107 acres of open space ($2,466
per acres)
·
allowed only about 12% of its land to be open to development, much of
what little remains rings the freeway
·
consistently forced developers, thanks to myopic
environmentalists, to downzone developments so that affordable units became
fewer and harder to deliver
·
grown .08%
per year over the past 29 years, with about half of that growth due to people
born into or inheriting homes in the county
·
averaged a yearly growth of ----that modest increase is not the
overpopulation causing Marin’s traffic congestion
·
pressed to become the oldest median age county in
California
·
seen the median home cost rise to a Bunyonville
number of $545,000
·
gagged its freeway with solo caring northward
workers unable to live in Marin
·
leached more congestion pollutants into canals,
farm fields, air and lungs due to its myopic land use policies
Where should
conscientious leaders spend the $2 billion in oil revenues? In Marin, and
elsewhere, take the oil money and put it where Californians need it more, into:
Þ
transit
(so freeways won’t continue sucking quality time out of people’s lives)
Þ
logical
land use (quit talking about smart land use and start building smart
communities for regular people) along transit corridors
Þ
delivering affordable workplace housing (state
statistics show .....
Marin could have had
several 100% + more affordable workplace housing units if myopic
environmentalists HADN’T CONTINUOUSLY opposed
physically reviving the train. Worse
than that, these so-called environmentalist have strategically tried to kill
the train’s future by drastically downzoning and forcing designs on communities
(Novato Oaks, Hamilton Air Force Base,
the areas surrounding the Civic Center, and now St. Vincent’s
Silvera) that could have produced mixed
used communities that provided train ridership, jobs and ridership for the
environmentally beneficial train. How environmentally healthy it could have
been to have compactly built along Marin and Sonoma’s train tracks a string
of compact communities whose residents
walk, work, live, shop and ride the train..
Since about 88% of
Marin’s land is set aside in open space, agriculture or park land,
perhaps it’s time $32.3 million of
that $2 billion be shuttled into a Workplace
Housing & Transit District
rather than into acquiring St. Vincent’s and Canalways. Why not treat people as well as we have
treated open space? Let some smart, truly
environmental politician, who is concerned about the quality of peoples
lives, call for using the expertise in
the Open Space District to
perform the same miracles for today’s crisis needs -- workplace housing and transit.
Let St. Vincent’s be a
affordable town oriented to give ridership to the train. Let Canalways be a mixed use project that
provides workplace housing, perhaps a neighborhood school and a high tech
campus for the Lucas company types who consistently leave this aging, too narrow
minded and pricey county.
Would Senator Boxer
and Congressman Miller re-title their
legislation “Permanent Protection for America’s Resources and Working People 2000”? Would Marin’s
leadership support such?
Dwayne
Hunn, a public educator, knows Senator Boxer’s fax number is 415-956-6701 and her email is senator@boxer.senate.gov.
Above
is unedited version run by Marin IJ on April 11, 1999.
Additional
notes not published:
Since its formation in the 1970’s the Open Space District obtained
contributions from Proposition 70 money, Marin Community Foundation, Assessment
Districts, CSA {County Services Agreements.
Open
Space district collected $32,316,931 and acquired 13,107 acres...
This
amounts to $2,466 per acres spent in acquisition.
1995
largest acquisition year = 2,426 acres
1996
= 206 acres
1/97
- 6/98 285 acres (18 months)
Acquisition
money is approaching bottom of barrel.