Marin Independent Journal
Sunday, June 12, 1988
East San Rafael’s needs
By Dwayne Hunn
During many of the meetings
on that San Rafael general plan, we heard various citizens talk about reducing
density in their neighborhoods. Maintaining their neighborhood’s character is
one of the reasons often given for allowing less density in the future.
This attitude has spawned
strong discussion among East San Rafael residents. The discussion goes
something like this: Other neighborhoods have for a long time had political
representation on the City Council and Planning Commission. East San Rafael
has not. This area hears the other neighborhoods demand less density, less
diversity more exclusivity. In East San Rafael, that plea sounds like NIMBY —
not in my back yard.
While NIMBY
echoes around the city, the city’s fundamental needs remain:
§
More
affordable housing to offer more opportunity to balance the jobs-housing
imbalance and reduce traffic.
§
More
tax revenues.
Where then must the city look to supply the fundamental (not the
parochial or often selfish) desires of individual neighborhoods and needs of
the larger community? The city’s political structure forces it to look to two
neighborhood.: St. Vincent’s-Silveira and East San Rafael.
Many East San Rafael community leaders look at infill lots in
more exclusive neighborhoods and believe more affordable units should be built
in those areas. That doesn’t happen because of the NIMBY attitude, the
political structure and the belief that maintaining neighborhood character is
some kind of constitutional guarantee plugged into the general plan.
So in more exclusive
neighborhoods, fewer homes are built on larger lots to guarantee that what
exists today appreciates astronomically in value tomorrow.
It would take tremendous political courage
to do what is best for the larger city and county community and put more
affordable housing in the more exclusive neighborhoods. The present Political
structure does not make that seem likely. So when these frustrated East San
Rafael discussions move to the reality phase, what does that neighborhood want?
Does East San Rafael want other areas to
pay a fairness assessment and send the money east to help subsidize the affordable
housing the other neighborhoods will not allow?, Yes, East San Rafael would see
a program that buys and up-grades existing units for affordable ownership
and/or rental as fair and equitable. Can such a program be implemented? Yes,
if the political will exists to wrestle with a neighborhood political powder
keg.
If East San Rafael is going
to bear the brunt of the city’s tax-generating enterprises and much of its
future housing—affordable and otherwise—then the city should implement programs
that reflect some fairness and equity. Implement is an important word here.
Socially conscious words written in a general plan are not
enough. The city should enact programs that will give East San Rafael
additional resources to carry the extra burden placed on this neighborhood to
carry density, diversity and tax-generating activities that others have
successfully locked out of their neighborhood.
Citizens from more exclusive neighborhoods have complained
about not baying their trees cut enough. From less politically wired East San
Rafael have come the anguished cries of residents
Saying they want
drugs and crimes cut. East Rafael does not understand the cost effectiveness of
removing a limb that blocks the sunshine when it is pitted against a budgetary
line item that can remove a drug pusher who will take the light from a little
child’s life.
Bringing more affordable housing and even
more affordable ownership to low-income families in East San Rafael will help
deter crime, keep the streets cleaner, raise smart, healthy kids and bring
pride to the city.
Dwayne Hunn of MW Valley is
a assistant executive director of Novato Ecumenical Housing and a Canal
Community Alliance Board Member.