Marin Voice
Marin IJ July
22, 2001
A ’golden opportunity’ for whom?
RECENTLY THE
IJ ran a column entitled “A golden opportunity for Mann,” supporting the
federal government in acquiring 17,600 Mann acres that are being studied as a
proposed U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Refuge (USFWS).
The
four authors wrote of the refuge program being voluntary, USFWS management
applying only to properties acquired, the government paying fair market value,
and of available funding.
Sounds
reasonable. The devil, however, is in the Marin details.
As
explained by exemplary USFWS officials, their programs should be lauded and
supported — yet everyone of the so-far notified property owners strongly wants
out of this voluntary, fair-market-value program. Why?
How
would you feel as a farmer, rancher,
land holding Catholic organization, raw landowner, bay front rod and gun club,
or homeowners association — if you learned that for ten years, self-proclaimed
environmental groups pushed the federal government to include your land in a
Baylands Refuge and supplied them with the initial maps that started this
process?
Or
that the first few meetings were held without you, the property owner, being
notified?
Might
you skeptically see this as a strategy to overlay your land with a government
program that causes costly headaches later? Ah, then you feel the pain of those
17,600-acre holders.
Most
of these landowners know something about Marin. They know that 85 percent of
the county is undevelopable, only about 4 percent of the land remains to meet
community needs, housing and population growth has been minimal and for decades
our transportation and workplace housing system is hemorrhaging.
Most
of them also know about land and development.
They
know the hardest part of doing something with the land lies not in the can-do
building, but in politics and regulations.
The
authors, who for decades have had the time to swap leadership roles in their
respective organizations, know politics much better than the fanner, rancher,
home and landowner. They have learned and acted on setting the political table
to their advantage innumerable times, such as:
Ø Having the Marin Supervisors
rule out a train stop at the St. Vincent’s /Silveira properties in Marinwood so
their organizations could design the owners’ properties;
Ø Forcing
developers to constantly spend money on arguments, studies and referendums,
thereby wasting affordable housing and transit-solution resources;
Ø Hoodwinking
the USFWS and the initially unknowing landowners a governmental overlay that
could drain more time and money from landowners. A brilliant political bleeding
strategy.
The
authors imply that only they and the government can properly care for Mann’s
lands. Yet, Tony Silveira’s family has for 100-plus years taken better care of
his cherished land than any agency will.
Developers
have turned toxic-sludge ponds into thriving pools. Shoreline homeowners have
assessed themselves to dredge spoils and keep their bay thriving with wildlife.
Farmers have monitored their land and runoff to keep their production clean,
safe and profitable. Most of them have also supported the pollution reducing,
community-building train plans and supported providing more housing for Mann’s
tapped-out and increasingly bussed-in
work force.
Why
do all the property owners oppose being included in even the mapping study?
Because they have learned enough politics to not trust anything that has – the
blessing of Marin groups who mouth myopic environmental phrases but do nothing
creative or imaginative for families, housing, traffic and pollution and energy
conservation.
Our
local agencies, groups and property owners are good at protecting Marin lands.
Putting any of the 17,600 acres in a federal refuge is not a golden opportunity
for families, housing, transit, pollution or energy conservation.
Dwayne Hunn of Mill Valley was part of a team that tried to build a 237-unit, solar-energy retirement community in an old quarry near downtown San Rafael.