Published Marin IJ February 15, 1995
Marin
Voice
Marin, why not think
‘regional’?
Dwayne Hunn
Everyone’s knocking government.
From Rush Limbarf and Orphan Newt’s cat calls to Gaebler and Osborne's
Reinventing Government advice -- everyone's ripping or reinventing it. But you know, some public sector ideas
are worth a private sector pick up.
In the early 90's Sacramento and the Bay Area were abuzz with
"regionalism." Transportation, housing, pollution, employment and
local revenue needs required a more relevant, comprehensive approach. By the 90’s Minnesota’s Regional
Fiscal Disparities Act had decades of experience addressing 9 counties
'regional' needs through sharing a small percentage of sales taxes
from each county. Why not does creative
stuff like that in California?
That vision/goal brought together some high-powered Bay Area
leaders. Unfortunately, in their pursuit they didn't hear the warnings that their
power profile and media pitch wouldn’t sell parochial locals on the vision. Too
many local politicians saw 'regionalism' weakening their authority, and its
benefits too difficult to convey to constituents. Given the choice of spreading more common good
through regionally confronting problems or re-electing
themselves. Through simplistic NIMBY (not-in-my-backyard) - oriented needs
analysis, these politicians opted for the well-worn, yellow political brick.
Unfortunately, the supposedly smarter entrepreneurs also didn't,
and still don’t, see the benefits and inevitability of regionalism.
Take Marin, for example. Whether developers propose projects,
which include affordable housing, office complex, light industry or pedestrian
pockets, Nimbys turn out in droves crying: Traffic! Neighborhood
Character! Cut Trees! Open Space! Property Values! The
Environment!……….A Bombay Slum Is Falling From The Sky!
Result? Each developer succumbs to putting up fewer, more
expensive homes or spaces. The middle
class, whom all politicians support, commutes longer for an affordable home,
workspace, childcare, or community atmosphere.
In Marin this happens to every noteworthy development. Hamilton
Air Force Base could’ve been a large, rail oriented, affordable pedestrian
pocket instead of an expensive suburban sprawl community. Bel Marin Keys
could have provided a significant number of affordable homes through innovative
financing. St. Vincent/Silveira
could’ve been another affordable rail and pedestrian oriented community whose
development could provide Catholic money to keep kids out of trouble and
orphanages. (It is still in the "thousand cuts” stage, as the
so-called environmentalists fight to boost Marin’s meager 88% protected space,
and lessen reasons for a railway.)
Only benefits would accrue if the major landowners in any region
sat down together and said, "How can we cooperatively structure each of
our plans so that our land, effort and profit will address the region's
pressing economic and social needs?
How can we educate the public and politicians so that they will
understand the benefits? Can we do this
as a united front, so we don't suffer a thousand slashes from environmental
guerrillas?"
If they did that as smartly as they are supposed to be, middle
America might find time to break out of their freeway chains, bring their latch
key kids to project approval meetings, and break the strangle hood 'naysayers'
have in throttling progressive developments.
Result? The private
sector would have profitably answered huge, pending public needs. There would be less government
maligning. A fresh public-private
chapter would be opened in America's New Covenant.
The Renaissance Faire space, planned as a pricey housing mecca
with a golf course mural shining through its windows, after cutting its
project in half, still got slashed and burned. All developers should learn from Robin the Regional Hood.
Robin gatherer a regional band of the weary addressed their needs and
became loved leader of an improved hood.
Dwayne
Hunn, a freelance writer, has consulted on affordable housing, land development
and transportation issues.
(Uncut
version. Boxed text includes text not included in published IJ edition.)