News Pointer September
7-13, 1988
One point of view
Rail/Highway alternative best with
development “pockets’
DWAYNE HUNN Community Contributor
The 101 Corridor Committee has been meeting since
1986. It is now finalizing cost estimates for either rail/highway or bus/
highway construction that will take the 101 corridor into the 21st century.
Their consultants’ estimates show rail/highway having higher capital but lower
operating costs. The bus/highway has
lower
capital but higher operating costs. The result is that both are estimated to
cost about $1 billion dollars. That money could be obtained by ratifying a 1
cent sales tax in Marin and a 1/2 cent sales tax in Sonoma.
Chief consultant to the 101 Corridor Study,
Bob Harrison, succinctly sums up years of research and discussion when he says,
“The costs are about the same. What’s important is how you want the corridor to
develop In the future.”
Three reasons make me hope the
train/highway option is our choice.
1) By continuing to over-rely on the automobile,
America disregards good logic that tells us to not rely on Middle East oil and
to seriously begin dealing with our atmospheric degradation., Carbon dioxide
produced by the internal combustion engine is one of the big villains in
destroying our ozone level.
2)America should lead, not be
led, in the high tech manufacturing areas of the 21st century. The United
States not just, Japan, France and Disneyland, ought to be noted for effective,
efficient long-lasting trains..
3) Marin is one of America’s
most beautiful counties. From almost anywhere in the county, one can ride
his/her bike for five minutes and be in open space agricultural reserve or a
national park. Only a little of the 19% of land that can be developed remains
to be developed, and much of that land lies adjacent to the101 right-of-way and
just happens to butt up to the North West Pacific right-of-way. Already
apartments, business centers, and residential units are planned along the
eastern side of Marin’s portion of the 101 corridor that runs from San Rafael
to points further north.
Many argue
that we should stop all that development. In America that means buying the land
at fair market value, which is not feasible. Many argue that we should downzone
what is proposed — reducing tax revenues for the involved cities and forcing
the prices of the allowable homes up even higher. This produces
more suburban sprawl and continues our over-reliance on the automobile.
Hopefully, Marin will not be burdened with years of debates and delaying
tactics over how the eastern portion of 101 should be developed, it only delays
the needed tax revenues, allows project costs to escalate and continues the
inefficiencies that long commutes promote.
What is planned by developers of the
eastern portion of 101 are a series of development “pockets.” Can this development
movement be joined Into something that is positive for all concerned?
Yes, with some coordination. These pockets
could be developed in a Mariner that would fall within the efficient land use
patterns that are proposed by Sausalito architect Peter’ Calthorpe in his
“Pedestrian Pockets.” Such development could also serve as the start for pocket
developments all the way up the existing railroad line.
Calthorpe’s “Pedestrian Pockets” call for
dense, mixed use development within a 1/4 mile of the railroad right-of-way
with, large open spaces surrounding the development. A series of such
developments through Marin and Sonoma’ would allow increased opportunities for
people to live and~ work at one of the mini-neighborhood pockets. This would
increase the likelihood that they would hop a train to go to and from work, as
well as to shop and socialize. The proposal Is so logical, efficient and
sensible that it is bound to cause debates, arguments and lost opportunities.
Dwayne Hunn is a member of
the Board of Directors of the Canal Community Alliance and’ is Assistant
Executive Director of Novato Ecumenical Housing.