Marin
Independent Journal Sunday, July 30, 1989
Tax-sharing
plan needed
By Dwayne Hunn
Dwayne Hunn is
co-director of
the North Bay Transportation
Management Association
and assistant
executive director of Novato
Ecumenical Housing..
Marin and
Sonoma could learn from the approach the seven-county metropolitan area of
Minneapolis-St. Paul has taken to deal with its growth problems.
During
the 1960s and 1970s, a significant migration occurred from the Twin Cities
urban area to the surrounding area. During the 1960s, Minnesota state
policymakers began to view the region as an integrated whole rather than au
array of independent governing entities.
In
1967, the Metropolitan Council was created as a regional planning body. its
powers included the imposition of an areawide plan upon cities whose growth
plans conflicted.
Part
of the reason for establishing the council stemmed from time wide fiscal
disparities between communities in the region. These fiscal disparities caused:
•
Businesses to expand in communities whose fiscal capacity (revenue generating
ability) was already high.”
•
Cities to compete for commercial-industrial property, believing the tax
benefits would outweigh the cost of providing
services
and the possibly adverse environmental effects.
•
The promotion of urban-suburban sprawl
and the resultant increase in costs for providing regional services such
as sewage facilities and transportation
Nine
years after the Metropolitan Council was created, the Metropolitan Revenue
Distribution Act was implemented. This tax base-sharing legislation offered a
potential solution to the problems caused by cities with unequal revenues.
If one community substantially increased its
commercial-industrial tax base, a small percentage of the increase went into a regional pool. The communities with the ability to generate
less than average revenue (In this area, Novato would be among them) would
receive funds from this pool.
Minnesota's
Fiscal Disparities’ program has reduced the concern over commercial-industrial
development. Communities have been more willing to have been more willing to
allow land to be used for parks or open space when the know they can share in
the fiscal benefits (revenues) of other communities that develop large shopping
centers, industrial parks, and so on.
This program should be part of the discussions regarding how to handle regional
growth problems in Marin and Sonoma.
It
took five years for the 101 Corridor Action Committee to pick a transportation
plan and propose a gas sales tax to deal with freeway gridlock. It took nine
for the Fiscal Disparities Act to move from the Metropolitan Council discussion
stage through court challenges and into implementation in 1975,
Based
on Minnesota’s rate of progress in dealing with land use and fiscal disparities,
the 101 Corridor Committee’s job may take another nine years. The committee
must immediately begin work to ensure passage of the sales tax and. then deal with resolving the conflicting city
planning policies that cause traffic.
Over the past
10 years, the chief cause of traffic congestion has been the Sonoma-to-Marin
commute. This traffic pattern stems
from uncoordinated land use policies. It is reflected most clearly in San
Rafael, which, for its municipal fiscal welfare, has developed a very strong
commercial-industrial tax base. While developing that base, neither San Rafael
nor the rest of Marin produced enough nearby affordable housing for those who
held those jobs.
Pooling
commercial-industrial property values, and then reallocating them on the basis
of need, can help address the transportation needs that imbalanced jobs and
housing have created. Effective use of Marin’s and Sonoma's’s remaining land so
land development effectively concentrates jobs, housing and tax bases in
pockets along the rail right of way would be even more cost-effective than
regional tax sharing. Such planned mixed-use development generates revenues
from each pocket and produces a second “freeway” on which trains, not
single-occupant vehicles, move people to work, shop and home.